1 Comment
Feb 1, 2023Liked by Sarah Jones & Jason Easley

Beyond troubling. It is inexplicable that this "information about information" was not forthrightly presented. Even if the primary focus was otherwise, this critical and central-to-events information could have and should have been identified (perhaps suggesting a second investigation formed to examine this deeply troubling evidence) within the overall report. This casts a shadow over an otherwise, apparently, detailed and complete investigative task force. Why would this information or this person be protected in some way? This is sad and sobering.

Expand full comment